The Marshall Protocol Study Site Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

Home
Search by username
   Not logged in - Login | Register 


Antibiotics-Basic Information
 Moderated by: Dr Trevor Marshall Topic closed

New Topic

Print
AuthorPost
Foundation Staff
.


Joined: Sat Jul 10th, 2004
Location:  
Posts: 17283
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Dec 4th, 2007 06:20
The following FAQs contain detailed information about minocycline and general information about the MP antibiotics used in phases 2 and 3:

The antibioics selected for the MP are unique

What should I know about Minocycline?

Why doesn't the MP use some of the other antibiotics?

Can I use doxycycline instead of minocycline?

Tetracyclines are all different at the molecular level

If antibiotics are effective at very low doses, why do we ramp up the dose?

Is pulsed minocycline alone effective?

I'm allergic to an antibiotic on the Protocol. Is there a substitute?

How do I take a low dose of minocycline when the capsules only come in a larger dose size?

Won't the bacteria become immune/resistant to the antibiotics if I take them a long time?

Low doses of antibiotics more effective

Why do you NOT recommend tiny dose of minocycline? How does low dose minocycline work?

Why and when do you recommend taking minocycline frequently?

Can I take generic minocycline?

Minocycline studies


Won't I develop a yeast infection if I'm on antibiotics long-term?

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics


Related information:

Why isn’t the entire Marshall Protocol posted on the website?


Is it safe to take medication that has expired?

How much does the MP cost?

I need to take a different antibiotic for awhile. What should I do?

 
August 09:
Trevor Marshall wrote:

I just posted an answer to a question from a Member, asking about our new thinking on antibiotics and immunopathology. Here is my answer, as I think it will help clarify some misconceptions:

"It is advantageous to progress to the Mino + Zith + Clindy combination as soon as possible"/ is still a correct statement. What has changed is that we now understand that creating excessive immunopathology by ramping the antibiotics too fast is not especially helpful. So we are really urging people not to push the immunopathology so hard.

Remember that a healthy person gets no immunopathology at all from M+Z+C, and this is also the end-point of recovery.

 
As people gradually recover they can tolerate the antibiotics without generating so much  immunopathology :)

That is the goal - to maintain tolerable immunopathology, and not to push it too hard...
 
You still need all the antibiotics - it is just best to take them when they don't "hurt so much".  And as time goes by, and their sensitivity drops during recovery, they will be able to add more and more antibiotics.
 
The key is to maintain a functioning individual, not one disabled by IP.
 
Once somebody has a functional (even partly functional) immune system, I have seen no indication that reducing the level of immunopathology actually terminates recovery. Whether antibiotics have to be reintroduced early or late depends on the state of the partly-recovered immune system.
 
Most of our cohort are pushing their antibiotics too hard. But those whose IP drops back to near-zero with Benicar alone will need to add back in some antibiotics. And as time go by, and their sensitivity drops during recovery, they will be able to add more and more antibiotics.

There is little chance of reaching stage 5 until after you have been able to tolerate the phase 2 antibiotics. Further, there is no chance of entering Stage 6 (recovery) until after you have lost all sensitivity from the antibiotics, i.e., you can guzzle them like a healthy person does.

Stage 5 is when the immune system is starting to take over the job of killing bugs from the antibiotics. Unfortunately, it sometimes does this with gusto, leading to unexpected (and largely uncontrolled) immunopathology.

The immune system killing can start to occur very early in the protocol, but when it is really late it comes by surprise, and then it can be dangerous, if it is unexpected.
 
The key is to only use the MP antibiotics when one's own immune system is not able to keep up a good pace of killing with the aid of Benicar alone. The other half of the puzzle is trying to make sure that the symptoms one is experiencing without antibiotics actually is bug-killing and not hormonal imbalance, etc.

The problem here is whether a Th1 patient can discern the difference between immunopathology and disease symptoms. Because as long as immunopathology is being generated, the body is working to get rid of the pathogens. Some people are unable to properly sense immunopathology, however.

Even intelligent people cannot necessarily trust their own instincts to understand, or deal with, immunopathology.

...Trevor..


see also Phase 1 Document.pdf

Edited October 09 by Admin


 Current time is 02:54



* We can help you understand chronic disease, but only your physician is licensed to give you medical care *
Always consult your physician before commencing or changing any treatment he/she has prescribed for you

Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Entire site Copyright © 2004-2007 Autoimmunity Research Foundation, All Rights Reserved
Click here to view our PRIVACY POLICY
Page processed in 0.0966 seconds (15% database + 85% PHP). 18 queries executed.