![]() |
|
The Marshall Protocol Study Site > ABOUT THE MARSHALL PROTOCOL > ANNOUNCEMENTS AND NEWS > Report on NORD Conference Sept.28-Oct.1, 2006 |
|
| Moderated by: Dr Trevor Marshall | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Foundation Staff. .
|
It seemed almost everything we heard about the future of research and medicine at the National Organization for Rare Disorders conference in Bethesda described what has already been accomplished with the Marshall Protocol. First, though, let me share some of the eye-opening flaws in the current system, as presented at the conference. Current Status of Drug Development Representatives from the FDA carefully explained the high cost and high failure rate of new drug development. FDA spokespeople readily admitted that - the number of applications for new drugs has continued to dwindle alarmingly over the past decade, - the failure rate of new drugs is high and - some drugs are recalled after they are on the market, due to product safety issues. - All in all, little hope was offered for anyone who may be thinking/hoping/betting on a pharmaceutically developed breakthrough new drug that may be waiting to be approved by the FDA. It’s not likely. Other Flaws Described - slow moving macro “evidence” research fails the majority - lumbering lack of ability to revise studies along the way - focus is on new drug development (still a problem even with futuristic speech focus) There was no discussion at the conference for any solution to a real problem that will require an “Act of Congress” to change: Molecular evidence is not *required* as primary evidence, let alone required for consideration in submissions for Orphan Drugs or any Drugs, for that matter. Are Medical Breakthroughs Real Progress? What Does it Mean? In discussing medical breakthroughs, speakers explained that new research from mapping the human genome and identification of genes related to disease has had little application to patient treatment. And there is little hope this will change quickly. The reason is that generally there is no idea what this genetic information means or how to apply it to developing new treatments. Everyone is focused on their niche of research and knowledge, but there is a huge void of people who might know how to put this all together and interpret it. Translational research is the new catch-phrase, identifying the dire need to quickly convert new research knowledge to more and better treatment options for patients. The non-for-profit Critical Path Initiative was presented as a valuable new tool or process through which safer new treatments can be developed and quickly brought to market. The Future of Medicine Dr. Von Eschenbach, acting director of the FDA, explained that the future of medicine will bring revolutionary changes based on the use of new technologies, collaborative and adaptive research, plus knowledge of pharmacokinetics and small molecules and integration of expanding knowledge of the human genome to arrive at new treatments. He explained we can no longer have the luxury of time to expect to conquer one disease at a time. Instead, we must focus on understanding the underlying disease process at work. He said only then can we identify common disease mechanisms so we can successfully identify effective new treatments applicable to several diseases within a disease category. This is the future of medicine. Fertile Ground for the MP In reality, Dr. Von Eschenbach described how the Marshall Protocol was developed. We are already doing what he described as the future. We are already in sync with the agency’s plans. We need to do is make sure these plans move forward while letting the right people know where we are and what we have done. The meeting was fertile ground for describing the MP, as much of what was described by key regulatory speakers showed the flaws of status quo in unrelenting truth, and predicted what we of the MP are living now (molecular genomics changing medicine at it’s core). Some presenters went so far as to say that in the future, all diseases will be considered “rare,” as all diseases would be handled on the individual level. Significance You can readily see how unusual it is to have a researcher with the breadth and depth of knowledge of Dr. Marshall and the ability to "put it all together." The caliber and breadth of Marshall's research, understanding and foresight is so unique, and the conference brought this into sharp focus. Dr. Marshall is so "in tune" with the future of medicine, what he has been telling us was what we heard at this conference. Our attendance at this conference allowed us to continue making the connections we need, beginning to build the bridges necessary for widespread education, acceptance and adoption of Dr. Marshall’s discoveries. We would like to express deep appreciation for those in Bethesda who worked to make a significant difference for the MP. Thanks to all of you for supporting us. Thank you to Janet Foutin and Susan Andorn for attending this conference. As I heard Janet and Susan explaining to attendees, we represented recovering patients who have new hope because Dr. Marshall’s successful quest to identify the disease mechanism led to and an effective treatment. We all believe it is an honor to represent you and share this success story. For More Details of the Conference All the conference powerpoint presentations will eventually be on the NORD website. The conference outline at-a-glance shows the take-away intent for NORD attendees. We will have photos online on our MP website soon. From Belinda, with assistance from Janet |
|||||||||
|
jrfoutin Research Team
|
|
|||||||||